Onebornfree's "Mythbusters"

9/11 Video Fakery, Governments,"The Matrix", and Your Freedom

2009-11-08T05:39:00.000-08:00

9/11 Video Fakery, Governments,"The Matrix"- Your Freedom

Congratulations, you've seen through "the matrix".

I assume you now know that the 911 "live" media broadcasts were mostly faked [i.e. no planes hit WTC1 and 2, or the Pentagon] , and that you have maybe reluctantly concluded that the government controls the TV and radio media, and what little that is not directly controlled merely churns out the same tired statist propaganda masquerading as "independent opinion", from government "educated" talking heads with fake hair, fake tans and overly white teeth, for the mass consumption of happy slaves and useful idiots within the matrix everywhere.

Government, and Government "Justice" is a Scam

Just like those 911 media "plane into building" movies, and just like all those permanently grinning talking [empty] heads in the mainstream media, government itself is a scam.

Ergo, government "justice" is a scam. So if, after having realized the truth [i.e no planes into buildings], you are expecting "justice" to be administered by the government in the case of 911 or, for that matter in any other case, I'm afraid you are going to be extremely disappointed.

Nobody Cares?

As for nobody caring, it pays to remember that most are happy slaves- they do not want to be free [or they think they are free]- they certainly do not want to listen to what you or I might believe to be the truth about 911.

9/11- Business As Usual

Historically speaking, the 911 scam is just another, [albeit minor] example of the way that governments always operate. Given human nature, and being what they[governments] ultimately are [i.e. socially acceptable supra- criminal organizations] , it is impossible for them to operate in any other way- so it is extremely unwise to expect any change in their operational procedures, modus operandi, ever.

For reasons I will not go into here, given the fundamental nature of all governments, such envisioned changes [i.e. "limited" government, "smaller" government, "fair" government, "honest" government, "efficient" government, "just" government etc. etc.] are impossible objectives that only the young stupid and/or naive should persue [for your entertainment].

The Events of 9/11- Two Facts You Probably Already Know

1] The Major Network and Amateur Videos are Mostly Fakes:

1[i] [a minor point]: Large commercial jet airliners are designed to fly at a speed of 550mph , their cruising speed, at 35,000 ft. At 600ft above sea level, where the air is 4x as dense, they cannot maintain a speed above around 250mph because [a]the engines cannot handle the higher density of the incoming air above that speed, and [b] the airframe is not designed to withstand the buffeting it receives at speeds above 250mph at that air density for extended periods of time, especially under the duress of sharp descents and simultaneous turns.

1[ii] [the main point]: And even if 550+mph were consistently achievable at near ground level, it is scientifically impossible for aluminum skinned ,plastic nosed airliners [flying Coke cans] to hit/penetrate/melt into 500,000 ton steel /concrete buildings without visibly slowing down, and without breaking up to some degree , as seemingly occurs in all "strike" videos, regardless of whether they are from a major network or originated with a claimed"amateur" source. And if such a thing were possible, the entry holes would not exhibit mostly straight- through cut,[as if literally sliced through]mostly unbent, steel girders.

2] Fires Do Not Cause 1300+ft tall , 500,000 ton Steel and Concrete Buildings To Collapse Straight Down in 10-15 seconds

1300+ft tall , 500,000 ton steel and concrete buildings cannot completely collapse , top to bottom in 10 seconds [South tower, according to seismic evidence] , and 8 seconds [North tower, according to seismic evidence], particularly in light of the fact that a billiard ball dropped from the same height[s] IN A VACUUM [i.e no air resistance] would hit the ground in about 9.2 seconds.

If fires were really capable of destroying such buildings, the collapse would be extremely uneven [i.e. not straight down top to bottom], and would take hours, possibly days, to complete. That's It!

Basically , that's _all_ you know [1 and 2 above] everything else is ultimately, pure conjecture on yours or my part, it seems to me .

Small Picture vs Big Picture

Three 9/11 "Small Picture" Facts You Probably Don't Know

1] Exactly how the broadcasts were faked.[unless you made them, you don't know exactly which type of technical wizardry was used to fake videos]

2] Exactly what brought down the towers .Unless you did it, you don't know exactly what, explosives, D.E.W. , mini-nukes, or something else did the job.

3] Unless you were in on it you don't know exactly who was responsible [ the roadrunner, zionists, Israel, neocons, pentagon, defense contractors, Illuminati, Masons, Jesuits etc. etc.], and even if you were "in on it" chances are you cannot possibly know all of the other nefarious government, quasi government or outside "special interests" involved.

One 9/11 "Big Picture" Fact You Probably Don't Know- This is What Governments Do

Even if you think you _do_ know exactly how the videos were faked, exactly how the towers were destroyed , or exactly who is responsible, the "big picture" remains : none of ["small picture"1,2+3 above] even matter, because, [ta dah!] THIS IS WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO! , meaning, if you have governments, sooner or later , this [9/11, and far worse] is what you are going to get.

Five More "Big Picture" Facts You May Not Know

The True Nature of Government [a]+[b]

1[a] Just like anything else, the true nature of government can never be changed/altered. Government is worse than criminal. After all, no "regular " criminal enjoys the sanction/approval of the majority of his/her victims.

So no matter who you elect [or how honest they might appear to be], no matter how you try to limit it, no matter what laws get passed, the behavior of individuals within it or close to it is always going to be distorted by the simple fact that they all depend on the continued receipt of stolen/counterfeit money to keep for themselves and then dole out to an endless and ever increasing line of sycophant "special interests".

9/11 was just another drop in the bucket operation in the ongoing criminal scam called "government", in its never ending quest to collect[read steal]/ hand out more money and seize more power.

1[b] Governments are not going away. In fact, most people are "educated" by government and therefor pre-conditioned to never question the validity of its/their existence.

2][most importantly] your time alive on this earth is limited.

3] only you can choose how to best spend your time here.

4] however you choose to spend your time, you and you alone are responsible for that choice -nobody else forces you to make that decision.

5] Just as you choose how to spend your time and must be fully responsible for those choices, you also freely choose your beliefs and must be just as responsible for them- which means that everyone else does the exact same thing- which means that in the end , just as you are not easily influenced, you are mostly incapable of influencing what others choose to think about 911 [or anything else]- the fact is they are going to choose what they choose to believe regardless of what you say or don't say - so why bother trying to get them to agree with your views about exactly what happened on 9/11?.

Freedom of Choice - To Stay or Leave "the Matrix"?

So knowing what you know about 911, and knowing that you also have a limited amount of time alive on his earth, you now have a very important choice to make - you can choose to leave it [the matrix] behind, without having to get even one other person to "see the light"[according to you], or agree with you about exactly what happened [regardless of whether you believe in video layering, simple fake plane inserts in live video, directed energy weapons, mini nukes or something else entirely], who was responsible etc. etc. or for them to have to leave the matrix with you.

As I see it, how you choose will be a direct result of what you believe to be the true nature of governments.

Stay? How To Waste Your Time- A Beginners Guide

1] The Red Pill ?

As I see it, you can stay and spend your valuable time trying to force the happy contented slaves within the matrix to see the light and "take the red pill", when all they're going to do is throw it back up in your face [or far worse].

If you believe my understanding of the true nature of government is wrong, you'll probably do this [try to get others to "take the red pill"/ "wake up" etc.].

2] Seeking "Justice"

As I see it, you can also waste a lot of precious time in a vain attempt to seek "justice" from within the matrix/system, and you can waste time merely with the expectation of "justice" from the matrix. Given the nature of government, 't'ain't gonna happen.

If you believe my understanding of the nature of government is wrong, you'll probably try to do this [seek justice].

3] Expert arguments and Egos?

As I see it, you can similarly waste a lot of precious time in climbing on your soap box/expert "high horse" -trying to convince others that only you know the exact truth about what really happened on 911, exactly how the videos were faked, how the buildings were destroyed, who was/is responsible etc.

As I see it, if you believe my understanding of the nature of government is wrong, or that all others will eventually come to agree with you, you'll probably continue to do this [indulge in endless expert arguments.]

4] Expose The "Real" Perps?

As I see it, you can also waste a lot of time attempting to identify exactly who all "the perps" were, and trying to convince others that your list is the"right" one- when the truth of the matter is, it does not matter, if you have governments you have special interests, be they "Zionists" [however defined], the Iluminatii, the Masons, the Neocons, the "banksters", the Jesuits, or whomever.

As I see it, if you believe my understanding of the nature of government [and therefor of the "special interests" it attracts/ nurtures] is wrong, you'll probably continue to do this.

5] Reform Government?

You can also waste a lot of time joining/forming groups with the objective of reforming government, getting certain individuals you trust elected, voting for this or that party, to expose "the truth" etc. etc.

As I see it, if you believe my understanding of the nature of government is wrong, you'll probably continue to try to do this [i.e join/form political or quasi-political action groups]

If You Stay-My Predictions For You

1] if you form a politically motivated "truth movement" with the intention of exposing 911, it will fail, or to put it another way, if it succeeds politically it will completely fail all of its members outside of those purely in it for political ends [i.e to have power over others- live off their contributions]. No "truth" and no "justice " will be achieved.

Regardless of whether or not you form a "911 truth movement group".......

2] you will fail to bring " 911 justice".

2] you will fail to "change the system" or "make the system work".

3] you will fail to convince a majority [i.e. of your friends, your message board fellow members, your newsletter subscribers, your site members etc.] that your exact version of what happened [i.e how video fakery was achieved, how towers were destroyed etc.], why it happened, and who planned and implemented it, is the right one, and everyone else is simply WRONG[!] ,and instead you will waste your precious time "spinning your wheels" in endless, unwinnable debates on the internet or in person, for years to come, maybe even the rest of your life.

But I guess, if that [wheel spinning] is what makes you happy.............

4] you will fail to convince a majority, or even an influential minority, that your version of how the world would/should work is the correct version.
[i.e how everyone else's lives need to be run- regardless of whether you are a statist of right or left , an anarchist, or even an anarcho-capitalist like myself]

5] If you choose to stay and fight government over _anything_,you will only make it stronger.

To Stay or Leave the Matrix - Your Choice

Although this mental matrix will always exist , and although it is almost impossible to get anyone inside it to take a look outside of it, let alone leave it, _you_ do not have to live in it, nor believe any of its lies.

As always, it is your choice. If you choose to leave you will find plenty of people who have already left, and left without you having to convince a single one of them about what happened that day- they already know and most likely mostly agree with you. They also know that the world is not going to change just because they have a different view of what happened, and therefor have learnt not to waste their time trying to convince or "enlighten" willing slaves or anyone else, or to try to "improve society/ the world" etc.

Slaves Will Be Slaves

Let the slaves be slaves, let them be scared by false flag black ops, let them fight their wars, die for their masters, parrot the status quo, receive their "free" government "education" , their "free" government approved "medicine", pay their "voluntary" taxes, worry over their fake monetary/banking system, swallow their blue pills etc. etc.

Self Responsibility

You or I cannot save them - if you believe in the concept of complete self responsibility, as I do, then in as much as they have freely chosen to believe/go along with the governments unending stream of lies, they fully deserve their fate, and consequently, many more 9/11's.

What You Can Do : Finding Freedom in an Unfree World - Freedom Awaits You

If you would like to leave and don't know how, I would suggest:

1] a thorough reading of :"How I Found Freedom In An Unfree World" by Harry Browne [original 1970's unrevised version, not the newer, 1990's version , if possible] .

Probably the single greatest book ever written on achieving your own freedom from "the matrix",politics, people you don't get along with etc. Cannot be recommended highly enough.

2] Act Alone- Do Not Join Action Groups- Study the [counterintuitive] Art of Fighting by Not Fighting

Act alone. joining groups just gives the government something to target/oppress.

Study the philosophy of the "art of fighting by not fighting" , as Bruce Lee called it in "Enter the Dragon", and in particular study the application of the principles and philosophy of internal martial arts such as Judo, Aikido, Tai Chi, Aiki-Jujitsu etc.

The art of "fighting by not fighting" is counterintuitive to most [especially most "macho" revenge/"justice" types]. I myself studied an external martial art [Tae Kwan Do] for 15 years before changing over to the [for me] far more rewarding internal arts such as those listed above.

The principles of using the opponents strength against them, of continually giving way, and of being where your opponent is not, when applied outside of a strict martial arts situation [eg to avoid governments, as opposed to directly fighting them] , can be invaluable in the search for personal freedom in my opinion.

3] talk to me. As well as being a financial safety consultant, I'm also a personal freedom consultant. I can be reached here, at my blogspot [post comment:www.onebornfree.blogspot.com] and at: onebornfreeatyahoodotcom

Stay Where You Are?

Even if you decide to do nothing except stay where you are and maybe suck a little harder on that blue pill, you've still [maybe] learnt not to believe a damn thing you see on the TV, hear on the radio or read in the mainstream press, so you are still way ahead of the game, yes?

Client Questions on Credit Union Safety, Interest Rate Rises, Inflation

2009-10-16T11:47:00.000-07:00

To view go here to my Financial Safety blog :http://www.onebornfreesfinancialsafetyreports.blogspot.com/

New YouTube Music Video: B.B. King's "The Jungle"

2009-10-16T11:44:00.000-07:00

Posted this a few days ago at Youtube- B.B. King's great blues "The Jungle", which I have attempted to replicate, right down to the "retro" mid-60's style.

Listen for B.B.'s great, always relevant lyrics!

Jump Blues Style "Watching the River Flow"- Fake-Eye "D"

2009-10-02T22:46:00.000-07:00

Jump Blues Style "Watching the River Flow"

I have just posted my attempt at a rendering of Bob Dylan's "Watching the River Flow", performed as a B.B. King style "jump" blues, on Youtube.

This was originally supposed to be a finished product but in editing/mixing it down [ 9 takes total], I realized that although the overall idea/concept ended up as I wanted, the final live performance left a little to be desired, particularly in the vocal dept. [too relaxed].

The guitar solo on fade out is pretty good as I finally start to relax and get into the murky area of jamming with a computer [something I'm mostly against!]. Oh well, with no band and no open mikes where I am that have rhythm sections capable of playing jazzy jump blues, at least that I'm aware of, this is the best I can do for now. C'est la vie.

Dr Reynolds and The "Vulcan Plane/Building Meld"

2009-09-14T08:55:00.000-07:00

Dr Reynolds and The "Vulcan Plane/Building Meld", or, 2nd Strike WTC Crash Videos versus Elementary Laws of Physics

Dr Morgan Reynolds claims [as do I and others] that the physics represented in the alleged plane crash videos [mostly "2nd strike" videos of alleged UA flight 175 hitting the south tower] are not real world [i.e they defy known laws of physics] - and that therefor those allaged plane crash videos must be fakes.

Here is a famous, primary example ,variously referred to as the "knife through butter " shot ,"The Vulcan Plane/Building Meld", the "Ghost Plane sequence" "The Self- Healing Building shot" etc.- for what Dr Reynolds and myself would say are obvious reasons, specifically:

the video apparently depicts a large airliner [140 odd tons of hollow, aluminum tubing with a plastic nose-cone] completely disappearing inside a 500,000 ton steel and concrete building with no visible slowing down at impact, and without losing any parts [eg wings, tailsection]on the outside on the shock of the initial impact, to the degree that even the wingtips cut completely through many, massive steel girders and steel floor pans and disappear completely inside the building.

[Also, in higher resolution versions, the wall of WTC 2 can be seen to "self heal" [i.e. become whole again ]after a wing has passed through/ into it , hence the " magic, self-healing building" term ] :

Building Moves- Plane Stationary-Further Video Analysis Dr Reynolds May or May Not Have Seen

Below is an analysis [by "teardrop"] of the last few frames of the same video, that Dr Reynolds may or may not be aware of at this time.

Notice that the tail of the plane remains exactly centered in the frame [red line] and that in reality, it is the building that moves towards the plane , and not the plane towards the building as it should be:

Strange Blues :Creams "Strange Brew" by Fake Eye-"D"

2009-09-12T13:24:00.000-07:00

Strange Blues/Strange Brew

Another one bites the dust!

Just posted my own arrangement of Cream's "Strange Brew", conceived as a slinky, funky blues in the approximate style[s] of B.B. King and Albert King, on Youtube

Strange Brew - take 2

Professor Explains 9/11 "No Planes" ,"No standard Demolitions"

2009-09-11T05:56:00.000-07:00

The scientific [i.e. physical and mathematical] impossibility of the "planes into buildings"on 9/11 myth , plus the impossibility of the employment of standard demolition procedures, is explained in fairly good detail by Austrian economics professor, Mount Pelerin Society member, adjunct scholar with the Ludwig von Mises Institute and Lewrockwell.com contributor Dr. Morgan Reynolds, in a radio interview here: http://truther9.blip.tv/file/2551353/

WARNING! : This information is highly controversial and revolutionary in its implications.

P.S. Dr. Reynolds interview also covers the Federal Reserve, Ron Pauls "End the Fed" proposals etc. etc.

About Dr Morgan Reynolds :

" Morgan O. Reynolds, Ph.D., currently is Professor emeritus, economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. He is a former Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor 2001-2002, and he also served as the Director of the Criminal Justice Center and Senior Fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Professor Reynolds is the author or co-author of six books, including Public Expenditures, Taxes, and the Distribution of Income (1977), Power and Privilege: Labor Unions in America (1984), Crime by Choice (1985), and Economics of Labor (1995). He has published over 50 articles in refereed academic journals, including the American Economic Review, Journal of Political Economy and Journal of Labor Research. He has authored or co-authored dozens of policy studies for organizations like the Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress and the National Center for Policy Analysis. He has written dozens of op-eds for Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, Investor’s Business Daily, Fortune, National Review, Dallas Morning News, Houston Chronicle, The Washington Times, LewRockwell.com, and other popular outlets. Dr. Reynolds has frequently testified before congressional committees and appeared on many television and radio news programs, including The Newshour with Jim Lehrer, the PBS program DebatesDebates, CNN, and the Fox News Channel. Dr. Reynolds’ research and publication interests have ranged over a wide variety of labor market issues, including income inequality, trade union behavior, and labor regulation, as well as the economics of crime and punishment. Over the last few years he has served as a consultant and researcher for the National Correctional Industries Association, an industry trade group for attracting and administering paid job opportunities within-prison-walls for inmates. Reynolds received his Ph.D. in economics in 1971 from the University of Wisconsin in Madison. He has taught and done research at several universities including the Poverty Institute at the University of Wisconsin, the University of California and Texas A&M. He serves on the board of editors at the Journal of Labor Research, the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, and the Journal of Libertarian Studies. In 1993-4 Reynolds was visiting scholar at the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress. He has been an adjunct scholar with the Cato Institute and currently is an adjunct scholar with the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. Among other professional affiliations, Dr. Reynolds is a member of the Mont Pelerin Society, an international society of free-market economists, scholars and policy advocates."

Dr. Reynolds's website is: http://www.nomoregames.net

B.B. King Style Blues: "Night Life"

2009-09-08T07:21:00.000-07:00

I finally, after months, writing and arranging the backing tracks, then recording the live parts, then finally mixing down re-mixing everything, got my Youtube video of me attempting to replicate B.B. King's great version of the Willie Nelson classic "Night Life", up .

B.B. King Style Blues: "Night Life"

Inflation Myths,The Federal Reserve,The Consumer Price Index 1913-2000, and How to Profit From Renewed Inflation

2009-09-01T18:24:00.000-07:00

Click on this link to read "Inflation Myths,The Federal Reserve,The Consumer Price Index 1913-2000, and How to Profit From Renewed Inflation"

"Blues For "September Clues" -Day in the Sun": 9/11 Video Fakery Research Tribute

2009-07-16T14:36:00.000-07:00

"Blues For "September Clues"/Day in the Sun" Melodic Death-Metal 9/11 Video Fakery Research Tribute

Here is my latest music "release" called "Day in the Sun" - my attempt at an artistic representation of the emotions of disgust, hate and revenge experienced by many as they finally "twig" to the reality that the Network's [Fox, CNN, ABC, NBC etc.] "live " footage on the morning of September 11th. 2001,was almost entirely faked, and which is also a tribute to the outstanding video research by the persons most responsible for opening my own eyes.

[n.b., despite the fact that I had never, from day 1 believed any of the governments story, it _still_ took me until mid 2008 after much back and forth, to finally accept the inevitable truth of video fakery by the media on 9/11].

The music track still has a little distortion[I've been months wrestling with a satisfactory mix for youtube- this is the best I've got so far], and the singing on the first 2 verses leaves a little to be desired- but this is a "ballpark" version for now I suppose.

"BLUES FOR "SEPTEMBER CLUES"/ DAY IN THE SUN MUSIC VIDEO HERE.

Fake-Eye "D's" YouTube Music Links

2009-05-12T13:38:00.000-07:00

Here is a list of most of my uploaded Youtube music videos. This serves as a quick reference both for speed [its hard to find/review them on Youtube and bugs the hell out of me] and also it allows me to see/remind myself of all of the musical mistakes I made in recording these tracks.

Electric tracks [i.e with computer generated backing track]

B.B. King's"Fool Me Once" short version [ 5 mins]:

B.B King's "Waiting On You"

Instrumental: Santos & Johnny "Sleep-Walk" Blues style version :

Bob Dylan's "Leopard Skin Pill Box Hat", :

Day in the Sun

Acoustic Tracks [vocal and guitar -no backing track]

Misanthrope's Song :

Jesse Winchester's"Isn't that So":

Neil Young's"Don't Let It Bring You Down":

"Somewhere Over The Rainbow":

Neil Young's "Old Man" :

Johnny Mercer's "Blues In the Night":

Jesse Winchester's "Belly Button":

Bob Dylan's "It's All Over Now Baby Blue":

Beatles "Blackbird":

Nation Ready To Be Lied To About Economy Again

2009-05-04T13:09:00.000-07:00

WASHINGTON—After nearly four months of frank, honest, and open dialogue about the failing economy, a weary U.S. populace announced this week that it is once again ready to be lied to about the current state of the financial system.

Tired of hearing the grim truth about their economic future, Americans demanded that the bald-faced lies resume immediately, particularly whenever politicians feel the need to divulge another terrifying problem with Wall Street, the housing market, or any one of a hundred other ticking time bombs everyone was better off not knowing about.

In addition, citizens are requesting that the phrase, "It will only get worse before it gets better," be permanently replaced with, "Things are going great. Enjoy yourselves."

"I thought I wanted a new era of transparency and accountability, but honestly, I just can't handle it," Ohio resident Nathan Pletcher said. "All I ever hear about now is how my retirement has been pushed back 15 years and how I won't be able to afford my daughter's tuition when she grows up."

"From now on, just tell me the bullshit I want to hear," Pletcher added. "Tell me my savings are okay, everybody has a job, and we're No. 1 again. Please, just lie to my face.........." Source:

Financial Safety Rule #1

2009-05-02T15:44:00.000-07:00

Click here for: Financial Safety Rule #1

Or copy/paste this link into your browser:

http://onebornfreesfinancialsafetyreports.blogspot.com/2009/05/financial-safety-rule-1.html

Swine Flu? Whatever You Do Don't Get Vaccinated

2009-04-30T07:21:00.000-07:00

Swine Flu? Whatever You Do Don't Get Vaccinated

Preparation for Swine or Avian Flu

A Natural Therapy for self-protection and treating influenza

Several years ago, various U.S. and U.N. agencies and the Council on Foreign Relations were spreading the word that the Avian Influenza could be as severe as the worldwide Spanish Influenza epidemic of 1918, and predicted hundreds of millions of deaths worldwide. Fortunately, that outbreak did not come to pass.

This year, however, a severely debilitating swine flu has already stricken more than a thousand people in Mexico and killed as many as 68, with 20 confirmed (as of April 25, 2009). The U.S. has already declared a health emergency.

For people who have weakened immunity and are vitamin C deficient, this influenza can kill its victims by rapidly depleting ascorbate (vitamin C) stores in the body, inducing scurvy and collapse of the arterial blood supply, causing internal hemorrhaging of the lungs and sinus cavities.

Most people today have barely enough vitamin C in their bodies (typically 60 mg per day) to prevent scurvy under normal living conditions, and are not prepared for this kind of illness. (Vitamin C deficiency is the root cause of high infant mortality and many childhood deaths worldwide; it is the root cause of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - SIDS.)

The way to prepare yourself and protect your family from this influenza is not a vaccine or anti-viral drug. I strongly recommend that if vaccines and/or anti-viral drugs are offered to you, that you refuse them. These actually reduce your immunity; vaccines contain many toxic components, such as aluminum, mercury, and solvents, and anti-viral drugs interfere with critical body processes. Historical evidence of vaccinations has shown that they actually increase the chances of becoming severely ill. Influenza vaccines in particular are notoriously ineffective and have harmed thousands of people, and there is evidence already that Tamiflu, now being stockpiled for a possible epidemic, is useless against influenza. The best way to prepare for influenza is by enhancing your immune system and increasing the amount of vitamin C in your body.......

For complete article click here.

B. B. King's "Fool Me Once- "Fake-Eye- "D"

2009-04-01T08:07:00.000-07:00

Yet Another Youtube video: B. B. King's "Fool Me Once

I just posted my recording/ version of B.B. King's great song "Fool me Once" here, at my Youtube account.

Enjoy [or not!]

The F.D.I.C., or “Fantasy Deposit Assurance Corporation”

2009-03-30T09:46:00.000-07:00

The F.D.I.C., or “Fantasy Deposit Assurance Corporation”

This post at my new blog, " Onebornfree's Financial Safety Reports".

B.B. King's "Waiting On You"-Fake-Eye "D"

2009-03-29T22:11:00.000-07:00

More You Tube: Blues: "Waiting On You"

I just uploaded another video to Youtube that I'm quite pleased with, my own version of B.B. King's classic "Waiting On You" , originally on the 1966 live album "Blues Is King", which, in my opinion, is much better than the generally highly regarded and more famous "Live at the Regal" album, good though that is.

Waiting On You :

Fake-Eye-"D" Does "Sleepwalk" - Blues style insrumental

2009-03-27T10:36:00.000-07:00

Youtube:"Sleepwalk Blues"

Click here for my new Youtube of me [aka Fake Eye "D"] playing a bluesy, electric guitar version of Santos and Johnny's world famous "Sleepwalk" instrumental

U.B.S., a "Swiss Bank" in Name Only

2009-02-21T09:58:00.000-08:00

U.B.S., a "Swiss Bank" in Name Only

This post has been re-edited and moved to my new blog, " Onebornfree's Financial Safety Reports" here

The Psychology of 9/11 Video Fakery Denial

2009-02-21T09:13:00.000-08:00

The Psychology of 9/11 Video Fakery Denial

[From a 911 Discussion forum] : "A while ago we were deeply discussing the no plane theory - well, I said I didn't think it was possible to do such C.G.I. in 2001 "

My reply :It appears to me that there is a simple choice involved here. You can choose to believe either:

[1] that CGI [i.e. computer generated imagery] was physically and technically impossible in 2001 and that therefore, large airliners _could_ fly whole inside and through 500,000 ton steel and concrete buildings with no on-film evidence of them either breaking up or even slowing down outside the buildings upon initial impact, while leaving almost perfect cookie-cutter holes documenting their passage in [but not out!],

or,

[2] that large airliners cannot fly through buildings in one piece [even in 2001 !] , it is physically impossible for them to do so, and that therefore CGI _had_ to be possible back then.

A simple process of deductive reasoning with two choices, each choice with two , black vs white [ie no grey areas] "a" vs."b", "impossible"vs "possible" scenarios to weigh/consider before reaching a conclusion, it seems to me.

That is, the physical [a] "impossibility" or [b]"possibility" of CGI technology being in use in 2001,
weighed against the physical [a]"impossibility" vs [b] "possibility" of airliners fully entering 500,000 ton steel and concrete buildings in one piece without slowing down, while creating "Roadrunner" style entry holes at alleged entry points into those buildings.

How one arrives at choosing the a's and b's of what is and is not possible here, at least in your case, appears to be a result not of starting from the crucial and necessary position [ for honest scientific review] of complete neutrality in reviewing all evidence before reaching a conclusion based on neutral review of that evidence; but starting instead from a pronounced, consistent, pre-bias towards the evidence presented by both the government, and by the largely government funded "scientific" and "journalistic" community that supports them and is in turn supported by them [hows that for impartiality?], with the result being your eagerness to consistently ignore what are generally accepted as immutable principles of [i] basic scientific research procedure [ie purposely ignoring one's own pre-bias in all assessments of evidence untill all evidence is collected/reviewed from a position of impartiality], and [ii] supposedly immutable, widely accepted laws of high school physics such as Newton's 3rd law of motion, in order to either consider or claim that CGI technology was not around and usable in 2001.

To summarize, to avoid mental discomfort , [i.e. you are employing a psychological defense mechanism], and therefor merely out of convenience, you are choosing to seriously consider/believe that CGI technology was not possible in 2001, in order to to be able to continue to believe that it was [and presumably still is] possible for airliners to defy fundamental laws of physics and crash into and through steel and concrete in the manner depicted in the videos [ i.e choice [1] ].

It would seem that the opposite conclusion [i.e. choice[2] no planes into buildings -faked videos] is simply too much for you to handle. Psychologically speaking,I understand your need for convenience. After all, most people would rather continue in denial of the truths and inevitable conclusions which must be drawn from choice [2]- it is simply to much for both their ego's, and their world view.

The mental gymnastics and contortions of both procedural and evidentiary denial such as you consistently display here are far from uncommon, and actually the norm, just basic ,self reinforcing,defensive "grasping at straws" such as a proposed "impossibility of CGI in 2001" issue in order to evade having to change one's hastily drawn conclusions and to continue to support your ego's pre-existing world view .

In short, it is impossible for you to conclude anything other than what you have-your ego and its belief system demands defense when threatened by uncomfortable facts, and will use any excuse [i.e choice [1] ] it can come up with to reinforce itself and carry on in the manner it is accustomed to.

[Another all too common example of "grasping at straws" would be the "what about the plane witnesses" defense, when any average fairly honest cop will admit that eye-witness testimony is almost completely unreliable to the point that in cases brought to trial it is almost inevitably disregarded as being a reliable verification of anything, one way or another.]

Although your average , cartoon and movie-watching , non-critical thinking troglodyte may well believe that airliners are fully capable of behaving in the manner depicted for fl.175 in the "amateur" videos when confronted with 500,000 tons of steel and concrete, you have no such excuse, given your claimed background.
e.g. please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwzDzX4XP7E

Still, I' m constantly fascinated by the denial mechanism at work from whatever source -thank you for your entertaining ,transparent denial [ie choice [1] ] - you rational, unbiased, "scientifically- minded" person, you!

For the original comment thread, click here.

9/11 Video Fakery, Government, The Matrix and Your Freedom

2008-12-21T08:55:00.000-08:00

Excerpt:[This article was written specifically for those of you who have had the curiosity, perseverance, the ability to think independently, who have refused to be intimidated by others, and who have, {sooner or later- later, mid 2008,in my case!} after a thorough review of the evidence available, come to the inevitable , inescapable and mind-warping conclusion that, given fundamental laws of physics, no planes flew into the twin towers, nor into the Pentagon, nor into the ground in Shanksville PA.]

DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME

[If you have not got to that point [i.e. no planes] then basically, you are wasting your time reading what is printed below- you would do better to first of all throw out all of your preconceptions and conclusions to date, and then to make a commitment to an honest close review of all the evidence, including hard a look at, for example :
[1] : http://killtown.blogspot.com/2008/07/air-v...aper-video.html

and [2]: http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialservi...-out-part1.aspx

However you will still be wasting your time without a commitment to first abandoning all previously held conclusions [ie what you "know"] , and without a continual, ongoing commitment to reviewing all evidence available in an honest, unbiased manner, regardless of how uncomfortable your conclusions may make you feel - onebornfree]

To view complete article,click here: here:

Why Dr Judy Wood Is Probably Mistaken About Hurricane Erin and 9/11-Part 3

2008-10-25T07:52:00.000-07:00

Part 3-Why Dr Judy Wood Is Probably Mistaken About Hurricane Erin and 9/11

[Or: "Dr Judy Woods 9/11 Research- The Good , The Bad and the Ugly"]

N.B. This article is in 3 sections [1]: "The Good", and [2] "The Bad", are in the preceeding blog post.

Part 3 : "The Ugly"

Anyhoo, enough of time discrepancies, I believe that there is a far more serious omission of information regarding Dr Wood's claim that Erin was artificially controlled on 9/11.

As I said earlier, Dr Woods' claims about Erin originally interested me because I live on the SE coast of the US where hurricanes hit or pass by fairly frequently, and have lived here for 20+ years, and so have a fair amount of experience with and interest in the need to track hurricanes accurately.

Another , Less Well Known But Directly Related Natural Phenomena Occurrence on 9/11?

I was fairly sure [from memory] of one very important [for hurricane trackers] natural occurrence influencing the weather on the East coast that day , and was interested to see whether or not Dr Wood had considered it/ included it or accounted for it in her research.

What Important Naturally Occurring Phenomena Was Omitted From Dr Wood's Research on Erin's Movements?

Five words: "eastward traveling, humongous cold front"!

That is, a large mass of cold, dry air [i.e. a high pressure system] moving in the opposite direction to the hurricane[ i.e. West to East].

A Regular, Fall U.S. Weather Pattern

In the US in the fall, these large masses of high pressure, cold dry air typically originate over Western Canada, and then spill down East of the Rocky mountains and usually move West to East across the US, often traversing the entire continent in a few days as they typically reach further and further South while traveling East.

This pattern of cold air movement is a regular part of the annual fall weather scenario for the continental US.

Check For Yourself

You can review the regularity of this September through October weather pattern for yourself for any year 2001- through '08 here:http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/noaa/noaa_archive.php

Any Experienced Hurricane Watcher Knows About The Effect on Hurricane Systems of Large Masses of Cold Air!

Any intelligent , experienced private hurricane watcher [e.g coastal inhabitants of SE US and the gulf regions], knows just through prior personal experience that a large, steadily moving mass of high pressure, cooler dry air traveling West to East in the US will start to influence any hurricane approaching the US from the East [i.e. traveling approximately East to West towards the East coast of the US] speed and direction sooner or later - and in fact , that the hurricane will always be deflected away from the cold front as long as it [the cold dry air] continues to advance Eastward.

Was a Large Mass of Eastward - Moving Cold Air Present on 9/11?

As a matter of fact, yes. And there was even another one that immediately preceded it.

Archive For 09/04/01

[click on image to enlarge]

If you take a look at the national weather archives starting 09/04/01 above, you will see a large mass of cold air starting to form in Western Canada. This is the mass we will be following [ direction, development ] over the next few days, through am 09/11/01. Also notice 2 other high pressure areas and cold fronts to the East of the most westerly one we will be mostly watching.

Archive For 09/05/01

[click on image to enlarge]

Now take a look at the map for the next day 09/05/01 above, and you see that the most Westerly cold air mass over Canada has straightened out a little and now runs at an approximate 20 degree angle upwards across Canada. Meanwhile, another large mass of cold air is pushing South down the East coast. [but its the most Westerly cold front you need to watch!]

Archive For 09/06/01

[click on image to enlarge]

Next, above is the archive map for 09/06/01. You can see that the cold front that started high up and to the West has now spilled down East of the rockies into the US and has started to move Eastward, pushing a large mass of moist, warm air [outlined in yellow] ahead of it. Meanwhile the other mass of cold air already over the East coast has pushed down and offshore. [This other front would probably have already been influencing Erin's speed and direction to some degree.]

Archive For 09/07/01

[click on image to enlarge]

Above is the archive for 09/07/01. Here we see the huge mass of cold air has extended both Eastwards and further South, and that the warmer moist air [low pressure,large yellow outline + smaller red outline for severe thunderstorms] being pushed ahead of it is has increased in size as well .

N.B. Archives For the Next Two Days [09/08/01 and 09/09/01] Are Missing From Source Site.

Unfortunately the archives for the next 2 days [8th and 9th] are missing from the archives and so we must now skip ahead to the archive for 09/10/01.
[you can check availability for yourself at: http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/noaa/noaa_archive.php ]

Archive For 09/10/01

[click on image to enlarge]

This one [above] dramatically shows how far, and how fast this HUGE air mass had traveled over the previous two days, and how deep [i.e how far South], it had penetrated by the 10th . As you can see, on the morning of 09/10/01[i.e.about 24 hours prior to the events of 911] it extended all the way up the Eastern seaboard into Canada , and all the way down into the Gulf of Mexico and beyond, and that it at this point covered most of the US , East to West.

Two Questions

At This Point , 2 Questions For You :

[1] based on prior performance, where do you think this huge mass of cold dry, high pressure air was going to be the very next day, on the morning of 911?
Please consider both its prior speed, and prior direction.

[2] What do you think such a vast mass of cold dry air will do to a hurricane moving in almost the exact opposite direction, when "push comes to shove" given how it is already seen to be treating the warm, moist air just in front of it?.

As I said before, any reasonably intelligent hurricane watcher knows for a fact that given a continuation of the cold air mass' direction , that in this scenario it is hurricane Erin that would have to give way, as other hurricanes preceding it always have done under similar circumstances, and as other hurricanes in the future always will. Its inevitable.

And Don't Forget The Other,Previous Large Cold Air Mass- a "Double Whammy"

And , don't forget that Erin more than likely had already been somewhat influenced [i.e. slowed, changed direction] by the cold air mass that immediately preceded the even larger cold air mass that followed,and which we have mostly concentrated on here.[Nature's equivalent of a left jab followed by a knockout, right cross?]

09/11/01 Archive

[click on image to enlarge]

So here we are on the morning of 911. notice that the cold air mass has now moved entirely offshore from North Carolina on up. {My only problem with this archive is that it does not show the blue line extending southwards into South Carolina and Georgia [where I live] when I know for a fact that we experienced exactly the same conditions, that morning as the majority of the East coast i.e. cold dry air, crystal clear blue skies].

My Conclusion: Erin's Directional Change Is a Natural Event-No Mystery

It seems logical to me that Erin's directional change is very easy to explain - it was changed via a very powerful natural phenomena, that is, an extremely large mass of cold dry air steadily moving from West to East, and not by any mysterious, artificial means that were somehow directly related to the deliberate demolition of WTC 1 and 2, as Dr Wood has claimed.

For myself, and others who watch hurricanes closely merely because of survival instincts, there is absolutely no mystery about Erin's change in direction from predominantly NNE to NNW during the early morning [around 2am] of 09/11/01; any intelligent east coast inhabitant, and more importantly, any weather professional or even a lowly weather bureaucrat could reasonably conclude well ahead of time, and with almost no shadow of a doubt, exactly how Erin would perform on the morning of 9/11.

Erin - An Assured Fate

As Dr Wood's own data shows [fig.7, in part 2 above], and as the NOAA data displayed in this java plot reveals : http://weather.terrapin.com/wx/DisplayStorm.jsp?STORM=01279&dtype=JAVA

at 2 am on the morning of 09/11/01 Erin's virtually assured fate was finally confirmed as it, after coming to an almost complete stop in the cooler waters of the NE, and after also being slowed/ affected by a previous cold front, was finally forced/bounced/deflected away from NYC in an NNE direction [a 45 degree change in direction ], by a much larger, still steadily advancing , much colder , much dryer naturally-occurring, high pressure air system , which had over 6 previous days made its way across almost the entire US.

Why Dr Judy Wood Is Probably Mistaken About Hurricane Erin and 9/11-parts1&2

2008-10-25T07:04:00.000-07:00

Why Dr Judy Wood Is Probably Mistaken About Hurricane Erin and 9/11

[Or: "Dr Judy Woods 9/11 Research- The Good , The Bad and the Ugly"]

N.B. This article is in 3 sections [1]: "The Good", [2] "The Bad", [3] "The Ugly"

Part [1] :The Good: Logic, Procedure, [Initial] Open Mindedness.

I first came across Dr Wood's research via a book:" The 9/11 Conspiracy - The Scamming of America" edited by J. Fetzer.

After then reviewing the abundant wealth of information she presented at her excellent website , I became open to the idea that some type of secret military technology may well have destroyed the 2 main WTC towers.

An Adherence To The Main Principles of Scientific Investigation [unlike other "scientists" involved in 9/11 research]

What impressed me most about her work at the time was her seeming refusal to draw premature conclusions, but instead to gather, and continue to gather, as much evidence as possible of many different types, even including evidence of post destruction preparations for new construction, and even post 9/11 construction results - i.e. strange things that have since happened to both old and new structures [unexplained fires, steel girders prematurely rusting, paint bubbling etc.]

As a non-scientist[ unless you wish to include the science of human action-or "praxeology", a social science], I found her early scientific methodology and adherence to principle very refreshing - something she appears to have abandoned to a small degree, at least as far as her research and conclusions about Hurricane Erin's involvement on 9/11 go- which is why I have written these two [overlong] articles dedicated to analyzing Dr Wood's Erin research methodology.

However, disregarding her conclusions about Erin, to this day I remain very open to the idea that direct energy weapons [D.E.W.] may well have brought down the 2 towers. Based on my limited knowledge, and given all of the many strange anomalies, her proposal _still_ makes the most sense to date.

And regardless, to this day ,her website: http://www.drjudywood.com/ to me has some of the best, most thought provoking photos, research and theories available on the internet.

Troubling Questions: Pre-Testing? Where?

The biggest question I have regarding the use of D.E.W. on 9/11 would be this:

The perpetrators had to be absolutely sure that D.E.W.'s]would do the job .

Unlike video fakery, which could be tested and retested until it looked right, the demolition of the 2 towers was to happen in real time and therefor mistakes could not be made.

Surely they would have to have done a significant amount of testing somewhere, on something similar to WTC 1 &2, to ensure that the weapon would actually do the job that morning?

So where were the tests carried out- and on what?

At this time I have no idea, [do you?] but in any case, it is time to move on to part [2], what I see as " The Bad"[and then finally, in a separate blog, to part[3] "The Ugly"] in Dr Wood's 9/11research.

************************************************************************

Part 2: The "Bad"- Hurricane Erin Time Inaccuracies and Discrepancies

[By the way, both part [2]"Bad" and part [3]"Ugly" labels apply _only_ to Dr Wood's claims about the direct involvement of the natural phenomena named Hurricane Erin, they in no way apply to her earlier research and work on D.E.W. and 9/11 in general.]

I initially considered Dr Wood's claim that hurricane Erin was directly involved in the events of 9/11 from the viewpoint of a 20 + year inhabitant of the S.E. coast of the U.S..

Hurricanes pass close by almost annually and so one naturally becomes hyper-aware of both the storms themselves, and of the types of natural conditions that are needed to prevent them from endangering my approximate area.

So in reviewing Dr Wood's claims, I was very interested to see if she had considered/allowed for the one natural event which both myself and any other experienced hurricane watcher knows will stop a hurricane dead in its tracks, and which will cause a significant change in direction, if not destroy it. [She did not, and has not to date- this is what I call part [3] :"the Ugly" here below - it comprises the last part of this article]. In the meanwhile,.....back to Part 2.

Radio Interviews

After initially only glancing through Dr Wood's website claims concerning Hurricane Erin's connection to the events of 09/11/01, I came across 2 archived radio interviews at her site [both with Andrew Johnson on Jim Fetzer's "Dynamic duo" show,] which further piqued my interest, inspiring me to go back and take a closer look at the relevant pages on her website [Erin 1 through 10] .

Those radio interviews [ with Mr Andrew Johnson] can be heard here:

[1] http://www.drjudywood.com/media/080730_Wood_Johnson_Erin_DD.mp3

[2] http://www.drjudywood.com/media/080731_Wood_Johnson_Erin_DD.mp3

Dr. Wood Says: Erin Closest at Around 8am EDT on 9/11

In the first of those 2 interviews Dr Woods said that Erin was :

"closest to NYC on the morning of 911, around 8am. And then it just stopped, it didn't keep going East, or West, it just stopped and then it turned around and started heading back out"

In those 2 interviews Dr Wood made other, related comments/claims regarding Erin's position and behavior , including claims that Erin's behavior on 911, as revealed by her own graph [ fig 7 at: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin10.html ] revealed classic signs of it being an artificially controlled environment.

Dr Wood's Own Data Refutes Her Claim About Erin's Eye Being Closest at around 8am on 9/11

Here below is fig 7 below , taken from : http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin10.html

[Click on illustration to enlarge]

As you can see,the bottom , blue line above indicates the distance for Erin's eye from NYC, based on NOAA data. The lighter blue points along that line indicate times for those distance readings given in Eastern Daylight Time[ EDT] .

Here is a close up of the relevant part of the bottom, blue line that represents position of Erin's eye relative to NYC on 9/11:

Notice how the purple line above the blue plot line gives a 2am EDT reading [although the number"2" has been partly obscured by my image crop], that lines up with the unlabeled light blue plot point on the blue line directly below it, making that blue point below also a 2 am EDT point.

Also notice the 2 upward steps in the blue line [look closely now!] between the first unlabeled [2am] light blue plot point and the 8am EDT plot point directly to its right.

Notice how this blue plot line continues at an increasing upward angle as it moves to the right of the graph and as Erin's eye continued to move further away from NYC.

It seems clear to me that the NOAA data that Dr Wood's has used in her graph[ fig7.] clearly shows [IF you look closely!], that Erin's eye was in fact at its closest to NYC at around 2am EDT on 911, a full 6 hours before Dr Wood claims it that was closest, and that by 8 am EDT it was actually already moving away from NYC in a new, NNE direction. This movement away by 8am can be seen in the graph above taken from her website: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin10.html.

A Minor Point- An Insignificant Difference?

If you believe that what I show above is an insignificant [ a couple of millimeters ?] difference between the height above the baseline of 2am plot point versus the 8am one, all I can tell you is that it is inevitable that it looks this way, given the format that the data was entered into.

Best View

The best view for actual position would be shown in a pictorial that plots NOAA data for actual times and positions looking down on Erin's path.

I found many, unclear, confusing depictions of such information at Dr Wood's site , most of which are for _predicted_, as opposed to actual path taken.

Where actual path was plotted, time and position points often blur/overlap to make then almost useless for close analysis.

Best Plot For Erin?

The best, clearest plot of Erin's actual path, based on NOAA data, I found not at Dr Wood's site, but here:

http://weather.terrapin.com/wx/DisplayStorm.jsp?STORM=01279&dtype=JAVA

This is an animated Java plot that, if you are fast with a mouse or trackpad, can be stopped at various time and position points along the route. Sometimes the site does not work properly, you have to fiddle with it a little and click "reload" sometimes to get it to play.

The Graph Confirms Erin Was Closest at 2am

This plot also shows Erin to be closest at 2am on the morning of 9/11, at which time it turned to the right, and that it had already moved a significant distance away from NYC by 8am.

N.B. "The Ugly"- PART 3 of "Why Dr Judy Wood Is Probably Mistaken About Hurricane Erin and 9/11"- Dr Judy Woods 9/11 Research- The Good , The Bad and the Ugly" follows in the next blog entry.

Air versus Skyscraper"-The Shortest, Simplest, Most Devastating, Most Subversive 911 Truth Video?

2008-10-16T06:25:00.000-07:00

" Air versus Skyscraper"-The Shortest, Simplest, Most Devastating, Most Subversive 911 Truth Video?

For my money,this video analysis, by "Killtown", of a purported "amateur" video shot on 09/11/01, of flight 175 magically disappearing whole into the South tower at the WTC, has to be the most devastating and therefor the most subversive analysis of the events of that day vis a vis the official story and "truther" stories which refuse to question both the validity and authenticity of the media broadcasts for that morning.

K.I.S.S.

"K.I.S.S." ["Keep It Simple, Stupid"] is the acronym that comes to mind here. This analysis works so well simply because it is _so_ simple, short, and therefor so powerful - my initial reaction upon viewing was [while slapping palm against forehead], " Of course! How could I have been so stupid as to NOT see this?".

Maybe your reaction will be similar.Enjoy!

9/11- Most Likely-No Planes, and No Standard Demolitions

2008-09-11T10:07:00.000-07:00

9/11- Most Likely-No Planes, and No Standard Demolitions

Introduction

Knowledge is Finite

First of all, I think that is worth mentioning that regardless of what you or I believe happened on 911, as always, knowledge is finite. This is an unavoidable fact of life that we all must deal with on a daily basis. Or, you can simply try to ignore it and go nuts in the process!

There are many who freely choose that route!

Reality- Nobody [except the perpetrators] Really Knows What Happened With Absolute Certainty

Fact: unfortunately, neither you or I, or anyone else, has absolute perfect knowledge of the truth about what happened that day- and, it is impossible for any one person to have access to all of that information, particularly in light of the fact that much information is yet to be discovered, as always.

Always Remain Open To New Possibilities

Because of my understanding of this principle [knowledge is always finite], I have always tried to remain open to new explanations as to what might have happened, and have therefor tried to remain flexible to new possibilities as new information came to light, rather than just painting my self into a corner of supposed "absolute truth", a habit which seems common even among those gifted individuals whose research I mention below, and also among the all too numerous "others" as well.

As a result of my deliberately open policy, my own ideas have been through numerous changes since 911, and will probably change again in the future, given the nature of the immutable laws of reality and of individual finite knowledge for any one point in time.

This is why I use the phrase " most likely" or similar on a regular basis!

Having said that, the views expressed below about the events of 09/11/01 are, to the best of my current knowledge "true".

N.B. "Ridiculous", "Impossible" etc. ?

The research sighted below will appear "ridiculous", "impossible", or even worse to some who read it. I understand- not so long ago I would have reacted the same way, and it has taken me a lot of time and thought to reach the seemingly ridiculous [to some] positions outlined below.

Nevertheless, these positions make up the main core of my current views about the events of 911. Remember, knowledge is finite, so if you have not been exposed to the evidence given below before the views expressed below might seem outrageous.

If the information is new to you, I ask only that you attempt to honestly suspend all pre-judgement, and to merely look at and then thoroughly analyze the evidence presented to support my perhaps ridiculous conclusions on the events of 911.

******************************
Main Article: 9/11- No Planes, and No Standard Demolitions

1] No Planes?

Most likely, on 09/11/01 there were no planes,only faked "live" footage on time delay of from about 3 to 17 seconds.

See:"September Clues Part 1"

and: "September Clues Part 2"

2] Impossible Impact Speeds?

No planes were flying at 550mph at 600ft above sea level. 550mph is a cruising speed for large airliners at 35,000ft, where the air is much thinner. Because of air density, the same speed is impossible for them at 600 ft. above sea level. Maximum sustainable speed at 600 ft for a large Boeing, according to Boeing? -around 220mph.

See:"Flight 175- Impossible Speed"

3] Pencils Through Wire Screens?

Also, aluminum skinned planes with plastic nose cones traveling at a max speed of around 220mph , or even at the impossible speed of 525 mph!] cannot fly almost completely through [disappearing inside in one piece no less!] 500,000 ton buildings made of steel girders and reinforced concrete, and all without slowing down visibly at impact, with no parts [e.g. engines, wings, tail] falling off at impact, with no engine sound prior to impact,[i.e flight 175] and with no actual discernable impact sound at impact

See: "Flight 175, Stabilized"

4]No Conventional Explosives Used For [Unconventional]Tower Demolitions?

Most likely, no explosives were used to demolish the twin towers [ possible exception of WTC7] .

Unfortunately for the "demolition brought them down" crowd, the majority of both collapse and post collapse photographic and seismic evidence simply does not support the use of standard demolition procedures.

See: http://www.drjudywood.com/

5]Steel Girders Turned To Dust?

Also, conventional demolitions do not and cannot literally turn steel girders to dust in mid air, within seconds. See:http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image42.jpg

Neither could conventional demolitions of 1300ft high buildings occur at freefall or greater,speeds,[e.g 8 seconds from start to finish ]despite what the "pre-planted demolition charges" crowd would have you believe. See:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html

6]Holes in Towers Made By Missiles or Explosives?

Most likely, explosives _ were_ used to make wing shapes in towers after either [a] a missile made the main "entry" hole, _or_,[b] the initial hole was also made with explosive charges.

This can be seen clearly here, as the wing shapes do not appear until a full 6 seconds after the main "entry" hole in the buildings' side, appears, and the plane, wings and all, has supposedly already completely disappeared inside in one piece!

See: "Amateur part 2"